 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
THE INSURER’S DUTY TO DEFEND
Stone & Johnson attorneys have obtained summary judgment for their clients under
owners and contractors protective policies and employment liability policies.
• Matsushita Elec. Corp. of America v. Home Indem. Co., 907 F. Supp. 1193 (N.D. Ill.1995)
• Obtained summary judgment for church against State Farm on duty to defend. Lansing Bible Church v. State Farm
• Obtained summary judgment against Fremont Compensation under Alternate Employer Endorsement for two members of a three-member joint venture sued individually by a worker injured at a joint venture construction project. Fremont Compensation Ins. Co. v. T.J. Lambrecht Construction, Cook County Cir. Ct., No. 98 CH 12836 (Illinois, July 30, 2001), (case of first impression).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
 |
|
||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|